If this had nothing to do with Muslims, why is that that Trump repeatedly referred to it as a Muslim ban, and why did his advisor Giuliani go on national TV and say that "Trump asked me how to do a Muslim ban 'legally'"?
Sure he can. He has every right to run his business his way with his money. You don?t wamt to spend money there, you are not forced to go there.
metoo = kill all men
Millenials won't decide the election but they will have their say....Horwath is playing the populist and it might work but if the PC party is going to win they need everyone other than millennials to vote for some fiscal sanity. Kathy will get a lot of votes as well so it could be a race to the wire.
No. No matter what you want, the other guy never, ever has to endorse your choices, especially when it comes to religion or politics. Any more than a Democrat baker can be forced to bake a "Trump 2020" cake for some GOP rally, or an atheist baker can be forced to provide cupcakes for Billy Graham's funeral visitation (with little "John 3:16's" in red icing on the tops). This is what it means to have a 1st Amendment -- you don't get to force people to approve of your lifestyle.
"Paul has no knowledge that Jesus had a ministry, Paul doesn't say anything about Jesus's baptism by John, Jesus's temptation in the wilderness, his selection of disciples, his miracles, his healings, his exorcisms, his conflicts with his own family and scribes, Pharisees, and priests, his parables, his all-important teachings on the Kingdom, his classic sermon on the mount, his teaching on / interpretation of / the Law, his semi-vocation as a carpenter, or even his spectacular raising of Lazarus."
My mother used to tell me "son, if its too good to be true, it isn't"
Andrea says she would not order any union back to work for any reason if she is elected....Is that a good idea?
The church can't do anything logical to gain relevance.
"I wonder why people can't talk to and understand each other"
Ah, yes... they're all false! Every single one of them....
I think being gay is being true to one's nature and the other is being true to a human invention. Sure, it's possible to be both. But the synthetic part in its bigotry doesn't like the first part. "Intolerance" is the name of the scene in the play.
A lot of them did. Like I suggested, go look at those men?s testimonies of their faith. Thomas Jefferson used the Bible, in public school, which was his idea by the way, in not only the teaching of faith and morals, but for history and English studies as well.
You are assuming since public schools don't openly worship god that none of them are religious, or at least that's what your post sounds like. The majority of US citizens believe in god and many of those practice a religion. Why would going to a public school vs a religious school change their morals like you are proposing?
The present should learn from past mistakes.
No, I did not. Read more closely. If I "implied" anything, it was that this may help align some Bible history in the last 4000 years.