I think that's a GM product, and hence approve. lol
This is the same liar that claims atheism is a religion
Or eye retinal scanners.
Are you related to my friend
High school and they are waiting at the bus stop!
It just seems your stuck on one book with a pretty bold claim of Devine authorship, which should require at least commensurate evidence. Yet you forward that weak argument as the bedrock of everything Everything. Then you reccomend that if I invested more time in your special book I will experience your revelation. I'll pass.
Care to describe what isn't natural about beer and intoxication?
More money than sense then.
No it isn't. When I have sex at 2am, I can barely work the next day. Obviously it is better than no sex.
Benny Goodman is not rolling in His grave. Because God is real and alive. Benny's body is dust in his grave. Benny's soul is in hell or heaven based upon his rejection of Jesus Christ or his acceptance of Jesus Christ.
I had one bankruptcy and now I know. Actually my credit score is awesome now.
True, yet my words were for people of 'discernment', which is a hard find. "Use discernment the reader", and "how do you read?"
Just playing down to expectations. You are the one discussing with someone who is ignorant right?
I explained that. I used "faith" as defined by the dictionary; not my definition. Forming a conclusion about something which cannot be proven.
Once again, you are making ASSumptions.
Have to agree there, any involvement on their part in influencing an election is a conflict of interest by definition.
*not an archaeologist* is the key. He's never done any actual field work at the site. Do you know of any real archaeologists who think anything Salm has to say is even remotely worth considering?
They're still known today. Just like dragons.
Christians don't have sharia law. You'd know that if you didn't plagiarize all the time.
And it detects level of use, not just the presence of it?
Neither Mark nor Matthew attempts to explain why Jesus was handed over to Pilate and sentence to die by crucifixion. For crucifixion was essentially a Roman penalty. And based on Jewish scholarship there is nothing in the testimony provided by the accounts of Jesus that warrants the charge of blasphemy. Look at the question asked by the high priest in Mark 14:61. Remember that Christ is simply the Greek word for messiah. Mark had the high priest made the association of being a messiah with being the Son of God. No Jewish priest, let alone the high priest, would have made that connection in the divine sense in the gospels. The Jews simply did not consider the messiahship to have a divine status. the question asked by the high priest in Mark 14:61. The claim Jesus made, as being seated at the right hand of God does not necessarily have any divine connotation for himself, as the Jewish scholar Rabbi Morris Goldstein states in Jesus in the Jewish Tradition: ??Use of the phrase "Son of the Blessed" or "Son of God" was no capital crime. The reference to sitting at the right hand of power (Mark 14:62) is not greatly different from King David's allusion to himself sitting at the right hand of God (Psalms 110:1), at all events, it is nowhere indicated as blasphemy.??
Yes for Friends.
I would have turned to the mom and said, "We can do this like ladies and kindly ask your child to stop kicking my seat, or I can be ghetto and smack both of you and still tell your brat to stop kicking my seat. Take your pick."
Again, post the citations to the peer-reviewed scientific research published in scientific refereed journals that falsified ToE.
When Jake says: "This is Sunday. It has been recognized world wide as the Lord's Day long before atheism came into play."