Most of sins above - alcohol, sex, so on - don't hurt me in any way. So here is your counterexample - myself.
Thatcher was a Brit, not an American.
I do care about Trump as he is imposing tariffs which will harm Canada and world trade.n He seems not to care that he is harming countries which have been America's allies and friends for decades. In the long run he will also harm Americans.
Yet breaking down the separation between church and state does violate the Constitution.
When you say 'God is...' you're making a claim in a 'natural world' language, English, and you need to substantiate that claim by showing that it's true in English, not in wishful thinking.
Thank you President Trump!!
Look at the Koreans in North Korea, Bubba. Those that come here to this country, get help from their country to do so. They are organized to do business in a way that others can't compete. There are many people from foreign lands coming here. Some are favored. Those with the lightest hue of skin are favored. Blacks from Nigerian do better than all other groups, even with dark skin. They don't deal with the four hundred year history of being mistreated . Two thirds are college educated.
Williams v Bruffy
Not to mention the daily dosings of how to mangle people seen daily on their 60" screens.
Ostrich with special powers. And a devilish smile.
1 - Do you believe that one day a species on Earth may gain sentience equal to our own current sentience and sapience? Or are we that special and it will never happen?
He did, love you neighbor as yourself that spells it out right thers.
"Good science is critical for the survival of country in the coming century."
First, when he expelled the changers from the Temple. The Temple in that time was used as a financial institution indispensable for the Roman tax collecting.
How precisely has it gone down?
?? i am curious. is it one in particular? or many fables?
Read the book geh. No...i didn't say anything about the old testament law. It fades away...as it says, but its clear what Gods stance is. I was referring to Romans.
Fair point, but if who can marry is up for revision why can't who can perform it not also be? For all of the time marriage was a legal term (and before that when it was derived from cultural tradition) marriage was a union of a man and a woman. Deciding we will alter who can be in a marriage while also then declaring who can perform it is off limits seems a little doctrinaire.
I support polyamory relationships as long all parties have consent but I don't know what this has to do with this.
Ok stupid. Feminized as in favoring femine vice masculine behavior.
Billy is scared of me! ??
No argument there.
You are so filled with anger you are frightening. Seriously, go get checked before we have another Hodgkinson on our hands.
Yes, you are correct. I was basically covering all worm basis as it relates to dog interactions and number. It was a confusing statement in context to the OP.
But he has the right "pic now.
you will be convinced, I don't worry about that.. the problem is will it be in time.
If you paint portraits, and you've painted portraits before, then no -- you cannot deny the *same product or service* to another member of the public. That's clearly discrimination and is illegal as a public business.