There is no evidence to support that it isn't a choice.
Just I am not sure, but perhaps facts may evolve a bit as new information is determined it seems that one can test the facts. One can learn and know facts.
They could always play in Canada for 40k per year.
Thanks for your permission, mom.
really? is Collusion a crime? and how many years and 17 million and what? investing WHAT CRIME!!!!
It?s always a woman that tells you. No man admits to checking another dude?s crotch area.
please dont think that although i make jokes,, that i dont take this as a serious subject. my best freind killed himself, as well as my mom. i hid the cause of her death from my brother and from others,, but therehave been others in my family who have died by their own hand. my humour is gallows humour
So the "plus" is bigger for surgeons than garbage collectors? How about teachers, politicians, accountants? How do those individuals fit in your "plus" scale?
Yes, you absolutely are entering into a contract in all these instances, from an economics standpoint. It's not a written contract, but it's a contract. A verbal contract, an implied contract, a boilerplate contract like copyright - it's all contract.
My comment " there is no evidence any god created our universe"
There's nothing wrong with the posts, except most don't want to read them or complain more about the questions or what they imagine I'm implying.
Bacon is hate speech .....
It's not one of the books dropped from the Protestant Canon. Many of the Protestant translations of it, though, range from prudish to gibberish. In their defense, it's an extremely difficult book to translate.
Paul wrote approximately 1/3 of the New Testament, so he is well qualified to comment on the holiness of scripture.
Hillary has a 95% chance of winning the election, lololol
False. Humans were created. Nothing ever evolved.
Truth shouldn't be sacred, truth should be imperative.
lol, "the bible counsels you, to do it now"
Stop being such an easily manipulated boob.
What is this crap I'm seeing on TV about those defending the cops saying "he didn't comply?" Well, first of all, non compliance that is not violent does not permit a police officer to beat the effff out of you. Secondly, why did this guy have to sit in the first place, what are the police alleging as a reason to even demand that he sit? Finally, why didn't any of the other officers step in to pull this guy back - as far as I'm concerned, this officer committed a crime - maybe even felony Ag Assault.
You poor thing. Voluntarily imprisoned in your sanctimonious ivory tower.