The employment rate is actually higher among Millennials than any other age group and the majority of them are homeowners
Solid 6. There is always the possibility that there is Something out there that takes an interest in humanity and is either magical. . .or so very advanced that Its technology is indistinguishable from magic. The interactions of this Entity (possibly an entire civilization or researcher, etc.) has lead to the mythos. An actual God as described in the Judeo/Christian/Muslim mythology. . .including creating the entire universe. . . .ZERO.
It's a cliche, but this is case it is true: Your rights end where mine begin.
...sorry let me rephrase.
I've seen 5 out of the 7 continents. Been all over Europe and the middle east.
I WIN I WIN!
Freedom of Religion also includes Freedom FROM religion and no religious person has a right to force their religious ideology upon others, or force them to be made into laws that will affect others and deny us all our rights under the Bill of Rights and the Constitution.
I?m arguing that you are absolutely correct. The dang legislature has no business telling anyone they can?t kill anyone.
Where are your historical records to refute what he wrote? He had the advantage of actually being alive at the time.
Fear does not ask us to believe in anything, let alone something we cannot see.
Light and darkness aren't uniquely gnostic ideas. Gnostics generally believed that they held secret knowledge of who they were, and that this world wasn't created by the one true god, but by lesser being.
So you crave the love bombing but detest the tearing down and abuse, like any co-dependent.
How are ya?
Yes it was a mess across the board
heathen babies? babies which he created ? not your's to complain about!!! :( LOL!!!
If you are referring to Hawkings' statement as dismissing a bad explanation of our existence,
Evolutionist is a pejorative used by creationists who purposefully choose to be ignorant about science.
You're safe :-)
Potty mouth, You may have seen Dougie's fake news of female reporter, microphone in hand, reporting breaking news about Progressive Conservative Leader Doug Ford.
No, it's not the same plus it's more like walking thousands if not millions of miles. And you have to cross mountains and seas and maybe even walk on air. It's just not possible. There is a lot of DNA that's needed to accomplish simple feats like adding a limb or wing or whatever. Making a finshe's beak longer is really child's play compared to adding a totally new organ or limb. Hasn't even been observed and no evidence for it. Hey, at one point I believed this nonsense and I'm open to believe it again, but this time I need evidence. I don't think unlimited time is gonna accomplish these incredible feats of of creation. I just don't have that much faith.
"Beat"rice and Lefty?
No, abstaining from sex, using a condom, or having the will power to pull out before ejaculation is "being responsible if you can not afford to provide for that child."
Biologically, race doesn't exist. But as humans aren't colorblind(most of us anyway) we can see the difference in skin pigmentation. That doesn't change the fact that people discriminate others on their skin color or ethnicity.
Nope. They wer paying off the debt TOO quickly at the expense of the economy. This one of the many feelings of conservative economic policy. A preponderance towards worrying about debt whilst ignoring the other contributing factors to a strong economy.
I'm asking if you can back this up. I honestly don't think you're right about this. Close to right, but not quite right.
The focus on "material support" rather than the conditions under which "provided" occurred might be the problem.
Then you point is unclear.
Stop making sense :))
When did he start this movement? How many followers?
Point well taken ! And Thank You for the Welcome!!
I would laugh if an endangered sea bird builds a nest in the middle of it... and they can not touch it...
haha.. no ..I hate flip-flops..I can't stand anything between my toes!
Wouldn?t that then open up for interpretation and division, of what should be dismissed and what shouldn?t? For example: ?Bob? interprets the golden rule is in conflict with the condemnation of homosexuality, and wants to dismiss those parts of the Bible. ?Dan? says it?s not in conflict, so he doesn?t want to dismiss that part of the doctrine. Dan thinks stoning disobedient children should be dismissed per said conflict, but Bob doesn?t.
I?m skeptic, since I?ll be taking the career of a scientific engineer. Anyway, to keep it simple:
Just ignore that punk...