Yes. And if one takes a close look at these so-called "medical bankruptcies," a fair number are from claims of "depression" and "anxiety," people who have drug and alcohol problems, and - as you wrote - decided not to get health insurance.
It is not a false equivalency. You're concerned about people in America in burquas detonating bombs. I'm saying that you're focusing on a spectacularly small threat right now at least in America. I'm pointing out that there are common threats that are much more deadly right now, namely gun violence, that many people are saying "oh well that's the price of freedom". In fact it would even be harder to detonate a device by someone in a burqa in the US because they stand out!! All eyes will be on that person, not the person with the pipe bombs in their suitcase or their U-Haul full of explosives.
com on drdos, what you say isn't true. God when will you people just see the truth about Donald trump and the republicans party not all of them are bad, but the majority who has clout are corrupt. President Obama did his nob he was hired to do. He sort out intel and relied on his reports to make crucial decisions. He did not take it lightly when he had to send our men and women in the field, someone's mom, dad, sister, brother, cousin, nephew, niece, grandmother. It did not give him pleasure to know his decision to strike could and did harm women and children. This is why he preferred to have table meetings with the countries when he himself "not his staff" went to speak to the leaders of the world. So he could get a sense of what he was dealing with and exactly what they wanted all of this was to KEEP YOU SAFE to keep us from where this country is NOW. You don't have give him credit. The world gives him credit. unlike trump they do not RESPECT..
I just want to send you my best wishes during this hard time and hope it all get's sorted asap.
I did answer that.
One can only argue one's way to this position through willful ignorance not only of Greek syntax and the meaning of the word "atheist", but also of the very question being addressed by atheism, as well as the logical entailments of any belief statement, including the denial of having any belief at all. It's become extraordinarily fashionable in the last three or four decades to take the position you have here, however, so you're hardly alone in doing so.
He knows better.
I did not know this.
He is merely a good politician so he will never measure up to Trump....no need.....just follow the lead....Trump!
Do you see the pain they cause?
I thought the left's favorite sin was being gay? I was taught to hate the sin love the sinner
They are some people that are uncomfortable working out in general
Ha! You are very welcome.
Lately everything I do reminds me of my ex. We live in a small city and explored a lot of it together. I feel like I need to leave town to really get over it.
Yes, from my understanding it is much rougher on the body than regular birth control. Not to mention really expensive compared to most other birth control methods lol.
If he has no respect for her, what about the guy who cheated on his wife who was at home with their child while he was doing said porn star? That guy is respectable but she isn't?
Losing pure genius there, Uks.;)
Start watching from around the 36:40 mark.
Yeah so ummm no
Seems to be so.
You lack knowledge to grasp that warm air rises?
All the time. I also sometimes count on my fingers when presented with complex math
I don't think you are fair on that point. You made the OP about Christianity holding the social fabric of Europe together- I pointed out that I disagreed and offered examples. If you made Islam about holding the social fabric of the Middle East together, I would have offered examples of how I disagree with that also. In a reply to another poster, I defended your position criticizing Islam as a potential threat to European society, and I have found atheist posters here for the most part not to be labeling you as an Islamophobic.
The fuck it is.
Philosophy is a clearer terminology to use to approach the issue. Science is based on Philosophy. Christian moral philosophy in its original informal form in the three Gospels took additional Philosophical form at least in the Gospel of John and the letters of Paul. Christian Neoplatonism developed along the Church line, until St. Anthony the Great set out on his Luke 12:33 ("Sell your possessions and follow me (Jesus)") mission of Christian spiritual growth training. The monastic tradition which followed him then generated a Christian monastic Neoplatonic Philosophical tradition that led to the eight patterns of "evil thought/vices" (later the "Seven Deadly Sins"), the process of Purgatio-Illuminatio-Unitio, which led to St. Benedict?s rule and others. The monastic schools then led to the Universities, where St. Thomas of Aquinas proceeded with his Great Synthesis using Aristotelian Philosophy, and The Toledo School Translations of Greek Scientific Philosophy reached Copernicus, Galileo, and so on.
You may well be right but opposing them against each other seems to imply either gradualism happens or punctuated equilibrium happens. In my mind they both happen simultaneously. Gradualism works WITHIN punctuated equilibrium.
Nothing funny about whores gus they have low self esteem, remember how your mom used to walk around all the time saying, "I need money to raise my boy gus..."and then she would put on Jean nate perfume and a bunch of "Uncles" came to visit you? That was your mom being a whore...
Children often exist to mature us. My own experience with fatherhood further cemented my role of responsibility and accountability. It is the same for women. Without natural reponsability brought on by the needs of another both sexes but in this case your female can be cast in the role of the perpetual child. Without having to think about offspring and their best interest she is left to want all sorts of things which entertain her...just like a child. She is impulsive...just like a child, without any concept that her demands are in conflict with that which sustains things like mortgages and vacation. She even feels that she needs and even deserves a vacation all the while not contributing in a way that would be deserving of a vacation. In your post you said "I haven't had a vacation" not "we". Even you can feel the separateness in your roles. You are her absent father and she's desperate for love and attention; but she pulls stunts, throws tantrums and makes ultimatums like a child which in turn drives you away and makes you feel resentful and unappreciated. This distance is coupled by an aloofness on your part which frightens her into the same perception of rejection that she undoubtedly grew up with further reinforcing the "daddy doesn't love me" archotype which may cause either a brief period of compliance and acceptable behavior that gives you hope or causes her to escalate and act even more desperate for attention. Her behavior is senseless because it's not predicated on anything tangible. She has a massive fear of rejection and low and behold hold her behavior tends to cause you to want to what? Reject her. Divorce right? Her terror if being rejected is often what causes the influx of rage where she becomes highly irrational if not to the point of violence and breaking things near to it. This is often when she begins screaming about divorce. I would doubt seriously that she approaches you and discusses divorce in a sober or serious way. Without children and in our culture she has nothing really to risk in threatening divorce. No matter what you do it's never right or good enough. Like the vacation vs house remod she will pull you from one project to another, one demand to another until you are completely confused as to what the hell she wants. This is a byproduct of her attempting to manipulate you not in order to get anything specific but to manipulate you into a show of compliance to her which momentarily quiets her insecurity. You'd think this would satisfy her when you submit and comply but it never does.
Certainly not all workers who would work for that are illegal, my point is that they would be more likely to take a job with unfavorable conditions. A company need not incentivize their workforce if they can simply get around having to do so.
Can you rephrase that, please? I'm not clear what you're asking.