Omnipotent beings also don?t need rest
A child can not consent.
Lolol The bum fluff? Michael there's no way you could look like a bum- no matter how hard you tried :)
good morning all...
Normally when you own a business you put up signs letting people know who you do and don't serve.
Yes, science should be applied to certain arenas. However, our society has actually tended to accept "scientism." It is a belief that everything can be explained "scientifically."
And that descriptive term is exactly what it means: the earth, in comparison to what is about to happen is "void" and "formless"; to soon change to be shapely with mountains and valleys and trees and animals and eventually habitable for all life. Easy Peasy.....
don't be boring. those are questions about your position.
Does that not answer your questions?
there is extremely scant evidence to support a historical Jesus. a look at the indomitable arguments brought by such titans as prof. Ehrman, really only boil down to one point which they make over and over again - Galatians 1:19. it's a bombshell, and personally I think a Jesus, who doesn't in any way resemble the one depicted in the gospels, did exist. but it is a very thin line of evidence, that could easily go the way of Abraham and Moses.
For her to concede, she must already have an appointment lined up.
I would be particularly curious how you would pair literal reading of the Bible with the lack of evidence of, say, global flood.
On the advice of counsel. Don't answer that.
I know many of the poor, deeply offended souls have said much worse about Hillary and Michelle.
I see a distinct difference between engaging someone in good faith, and then giving up in frustration, and going into an OP looking to get angry.
>>"It is a presumption. That is what it says in the gospel."<<
Which premise of my argument have I violated?
In Silicon Valley, it's the young, unmarried ones they build the offices out for, so they can stay and practically live there and work and play, etc.
I see you've skipped the speech or expressive speech element. That's whats at stake, everything else is just noise....
No one's political leanings have NOTHING to do with THIS.
When it is regulating it, that is condoning it.
Do shut up Mitt, you milquetoast dingleberry. I predict that you suck.
Typical. And pathetic! LOL!
Laws against nudity are also for hygiene issues
Me: Objection, your Honor! Fred's question has nothing to do with the argument at hand.
That isn't what I was implying. In fact, I didn't even mention christianity. I kept it very generalized to religion
My boy Flounder from Animal House said it best:
And when the Bible says:
Yeah, that's a load of shit so deep I could lose a Ford F150 in it.
The only other option is that they choose it, no?
Lol! Nope,, but I certainly wouldn't pass that place by! It has worked in bars, restaurants, malls, grocery stores, beaches.... almost anyplace I find a lady w/a pedi and/or toe rings. Had a lady in a department store ask as I walked past the shoe section "excuse me, from a man's perspective, do these heels look good?"
I can see you have this well thought out.
That's not fair, there are plenty of creeps who think all women want them for one reason or another who never cross that #MeToo line.