When you cut off all contact after breaking up, there is no reason to get back together. The only time you should talk to an ex is if you have a child or children with them. That's it, that's all.
Morality is a myth.
Lots of simple & complex equations equal zero. 7 - 2 - 1.5 - 3.5 = 0, too. This is in no way dividing zero into discrete units.
The single ones still run to daddy
Because women are smart.
Here in Pennsylvania I don't recall anyone anywhere breaking out in a sweat. Was very comfortable before and after our American Legion Memorial Day ceremony.
Not necessarily: there might be good reasons to define ideas as stupid and dangerous.
No, he's 0% sure.
Oh, i do !
Let me make something clear. There are no gasses in heaven. No Oxygen, and the fire is pointing to the Celestial light.
That?s an issue within yourself.
If an officer approaches you and puts his hands on you without telling you you are being detain, he is attacking you and you have every right to defend yourself with whatever force necessary. And it is an automatic pay day.
She had me at bacon....
The usual answers show a backward projection. W. Robertson Smith in 1899 demonstrated that the God of the Old Testament, changed and increased his power. And he also increased his area of operation and authority. Starting out as a small time ba'al, he rose to to become CEO, formerly King, of the entire world and later with acquisition, Lord of the universe.
I've been getting A LOT of push back from the school even though I've already withdrawn my son. They pushed back on me from the time I gave them notice and they're still being jerks to me. It's so bizarre. It's not like their enrollment is sinking that they need to freak out about one child. They're taking it so personal right now.
You said Mosaic law didn't apply! Make up your mind!
Not necessarily. But when those claims are about what is right, what is wrong and possible eternal life or eternal torture...then yes we should be skeptical.
Yes, I actually agree with you on all these points, it's still slightly beside the even more abstract point I'm aiming for. I must not be expressing myself very well...
My family will tell you I am an angel.
I wonder if "his"... ever hurt..
Dude, did your account get hacked ? Can't count the number of up-votes I have given you in the past, how completely interesting... Well, ya never really know someone till you do...
(Tex...this response isn't specific to you I just hit reply on your name)
> See the OP for the arguments supporting that premise.
I'm certainly not being argumentative, you asked a fair question, I provided a fair answer.
I am against sodomy laws. What goes on between consenting adults is no business of anybody else. Drug laws are also bad. What an adult chooses to do with their own body is no business of anybody else. Polygamy same... homosexual marriage... well they obviously figured that out now. Government must not have bias, so any laws it creates which demonstrate a bias, like the adoption law, are wrong. Society or the tyranny of the majority has no place in legislating the acceptable behavior of others when no real harm is caused by that behavior.
God is a definite whack-job. "Believe in me or else."
I live in a suburb of Washington DC, and I NEVER lock my doors. Never have.
That was probably one of the most incoherent posts of yours so far. Take a breath and relax, this is just a debate. For someone who cares not to dabble in 'vain and useless' questions, you're easily excited when you disagree with someone who does. You said it is a 'mere fact' that Atheism doesn't bother about anything that is not proven; in the same post you said there are indeed 'Atheists who grapple with existential questions...' Those statements contradict each other, I wonder if you want to pick one and just go with it, or if you prefer to continue talking in circles?