Squirting is not the same as O in your case?
Absolutely; should I care? He has no 'life' in him; he is just a "snake oil salesman".
It's rude to use capital letters. Looks like you are shouting.
Ummm, I just presented facts from the liberal think tank, Brookings Institute.
Sorry. I will try to do worse next time.
With absolute and irrefutable certainty: 42.
What a dirty situation.
quirks are one thing, but if they take up too much of your love for the relationship, thats another thing!!!
Same thing, but in the Levant.
The Great Yogi also said
Not really, we have created better "eyes" that allow us to see things our regular eyes cannot detect.
Yeah, I concur, there is a lot of wild & unexplained events and things out there in the woolly world... But that does not demonstrate supernature, just our ignorance.
Pithy Wititude, Region Rat... True!... The ignorant can post in a free country.... But it dose seem strange.....When Christianity made any notion of paganism obsolete with In the last couple of hundred years.. Except for the rare few that like to dress up in costumes and make an even worse mockery of it then what it already was.... Atheism doing a good job cleaning them up too with some basic concepts of logic as well.
I'm saying pregnancy is not an ailment, even if there are ailments associated with it.
I don?t lament anything. Do you know what that word means? I asked a question. I find the surety that everyone else must need exactly what those folks need to be amusing.
I haven't commented at all on the articles nor really the OP so to assume I am saying something is beyond ridiculous, all I have ever done here is point out that you know nothing about what you are talking about in regards to evolution or anything pertain to or around it.
And you cling to disorganized religion old bitter man
I've heard of them. Didn't know they were an actual butcher shop as well.
Time to send in the army and arrest and summarily execute all the treasonists.
That?s your opinion
No, its pretty much just all made up nonsense.
Sub species, even sub to sister species happens all the time. Dog and wolf are sister species. Its not what is needed to confirm evo is observed to do what it boasts happened. Its all on paper nothing observed. Now, with genetics there's zero excuse...youd think. The fast breeding species. There's isolation, then over time its a new sub species. If given enough time supposedly this change (all internal) creates barriers where the old group cannot interbreed anylonger. This is only happening with hybrids. Two existing species breeding to form one other, but they aren't the success evo needs either. The males become sterile, females fertile or both. Dead ends the species is doomed, certainly not this continuous event. See, this is all just the very start of observable evo in the spot light. That tree of life? Its a mere node, a split on this supposed tree depicting common descent all life. Its just the very start with internal barriers where gene flow from former to new cease. Its imperative. Otherwise you have a back and forth problem going on, like today with grizzlies and polar bears, threatened to lose one from interbreeding. Anyways. The idea and hope for evo is to document the change from this node to novel complex structure on similar structured specimen. :) its a no show, not even the very very start.
Believers like the author keep saying there is no evidence for common descent a scientific conclusion derived from the evidence discovered yet are perfectly okay accepting that a dead Jew came back to life on without any evidence. The gospels, the gospels . . . yes the gospels are the claim not the evidence. So what is the scientific evidence that resurrection is possible. Just an FYI to the author, "Test the prophecy" is not scientific evidence.
I've already posted it. Perhaps you didn't see it or didn't want to acknowledge it so I will post it again along with a second one.
How far is too far? Isn't it already too far? Your warning is laughable.
It can. It has happened before.
Yeah, I know. It?s outside your comfort zone. Sorry, but I?m long past post-Scientism. And you thought slamming the "Supernatural" was a no-brainer.
How about I just keep considering you to be human rather than god and leave it at that. My debating skills I test in threads about reality, not this superstitious, paranormal fantasy you're trying to feed me.
Making a fool of yourself? You did that when you boasted that God does not exist. So, you take the cake on that fool-making.
What? I can assure you that I have harmed no women whatsoever, nor do I plan to do so.
Of the people you list Muhammed is actually the one most likely to have lived and existed as described in their own particular religion.
So the "plus" is bigger for surgeons than garbage collectors? How about teachers, politicians, accountants? How do those individuals fit in your "plus" scale?
But calling a person a bigot is a ok? Wow.. makes sense.
That is just my opinion. I have some strong opinions about Christianity and I don't think very many of the 'preachers' that seem to be pushing themselves more than Christ are true Christians. I think they are the ones Jesus warned us about. Samaritan's Purse does a lot of good, I agree but I certainly don't give Franklin credit for that. And I would guess that people do not know how much Franklin profits from it either.