You will note that they made personal life changes that brought them happiness. The rest of it is nobody's business and the government has no right to take their freedoms from them.
Because we can be! :P
If you have sex with multiple people in the same day the sperm will cancel each other out and you won?t get pregnant
Or if they weren't born here.
Don't not test the Lord it will not turn out well when he comes on the last day
1) there is no talking snake in genesis
I asked about responsibility for the act not legality around it. But since you mentioned the law, should law change to reflect the fact they never consented to what the bullets ended up doing?
The question seems to center on the issue of what "most" people think are objective moral standards. "Most" being a category that excludes sociopaths, who by definition do not have a conscience as the term normally connotes - so they don't count. For the rest of us, as others have already said, the question could be framed as: "Name one instance where the violent rape and/or outright premeditated murder of a child is not immoral". Since we've excluded sociopaths, among them "Satanist" and drug cults, etc., I think every non-sociopath would reply, "Of course there is no way in which such a violation/murder is not immoral". Would this not indicate that, among the non-sociopathic population, that there is an objective moral standard, whether or not it comes from simple human empathy or divine mandate?
Im not a baker. Perhaps you should go find a baker and let me know what the outcome of your question was.
atheism is simply a disbelief in a god. You add ANYTHING to that, you are just wrong
Paul wasn't a Christian or follower when Jesus was alive.
Happy big day Susan!
Again I will apologize if I have offended you. I do not agree with your veiws on the topic, but I wish you no ill will.
Seems more likely we sprang forth to be used by bacteria.
It's a thought that i wanted to share and get feedback on, if that is wrong, so be it. I don't think this is my launching point into mainstream physics, this is just a discussion.
I did not know that they had dictionaries back then. Constantine burned all of the manuscripts that they did not vote into the bible for fear that the realities of their new religion would become public and the fraud expose so he also made talking about religion or being anything other than a christian a capitol offense. Faith my ass.
Can we stop talking about your mother? My mentioning what she would have thought when she sees you in the march-past was only a reference to: 'only a mother could love him'.
I don't get to decide for other people what they choose to do - particularly when it is legal.
Revelations wasn't written by John. It was written long after he was dead and gone, by Cerinthus.
On a scale of 0-100, how certain are you?
Then you better question experience.
Only the barrier methods, although the spermicides sometimes used with barriers may also provide some protection.
Well, "guaranteed livable income" and "guaranteed livable wage" are two different things, so maybe I just misunderstood you?
Then I guess he really does believe that life is literally a box of chocolates. LOL
Plato I think probably existed. Socrates and Buddha are definitely fictional characters. We know this by the style of literature that describes them. The same style identifies and classifies the gospels as fiction too.
Who defines what is right?
If you experience amnesia, my original comment was based on "Many of these mass shooters
just for clarification, Susan,
Do you believe the bible to be...
Or, to put it differently: Christians, how's that theism working out?
I gave my proof
The facts about how destructive homosexual behavior are verifiable.