The only thing I found offensive was you trying to throw in the "how about reading the article next time" comment. You could have just written "hey, that girl's the victim of the shooter, but the shooter was also a 13 y/o white kid." Instead, you don't even say in your posting "he" won't be charged as an adult. You leave out pronouns - if you just wrote "he won't be charged as an adult," then I would have realized the pic was not of the shooter.
Sorry, but it?s not a matter of anticipating where you?re going, but a matter of you asking the same question about why he objects and expecting a different answer. I gave a range of reasons on why he could object. So you either need to clarify your point or we need to move on.
Lol Harry and Meghan looked like :| awhile there too.
If that is the only policy then the US economy will under-perform.
It seems you have shut the door on God & your comment was for
"after an escalating number of gang related shootings."
Looks like they are doing everything possible to stave off a full blown revolt...
Nah, ... it is not at all difficult to think. It is difficult to think almighty god is good and compassionate while in reality he is horrible blood thirsty sadistic monster. THAT is reality. And no wonder people committed so many atrocities in name of their religion because obviously they were able to turn blind eye on for truth.
Lmao, I'm taking a bat and kicking the shit out of a dog that comes after mine. Sorry doggy, I love all dogs but if it comes down to my dog's life or yours, you got to go lmao.
Not my claim. You made the claim, it is your burden to prove. Can you share with me a resource that supports your view?
1) Ok. So how does preaching at myself and other Christians on the religious channel help you change your laws?
That is your view and you are welcome to it. You do not get to claim it as a fact until you can prove it is correct to others.
I don't know about the GTA, are white people out numbered there? Regardless there's lots of white people all over Ontario that can go out and vote too.
Which is why you never see a Catholic priest or a nun in street clothes with no outward identification. Which explains why celibacy was not required of priests until the fourth century when the church, having gotten too bit for its britches, needed to feel, as you put it, special, chosen and blessed.
I never saw the boots before you mentioned it. I thought it was umbrellas that disappeared into police badges. But now I see the boots....I need to do more work on my visual observations, lol.
Which, was not created by Christ himself, who said all the old rules still counted. Hell he was more strict on divorce then Moses. Paul however, hated jews, gods he hated them and so did his church.
Awwwww damn!! La-foo-shhh
Why focus on one specific issue, religion? I might have done that, 45 years ago. Today, I think that non-religious people are one factor.
I always understood that saying prayers clearly was unnecessary, that God knows what you are thinking or some such nonsense.
Paris and Iran are blowing stuff up.
There you go again. You just did it again. That is a logical fallacy. You don't give up on a bad idea that is for sure. The problem is that bad ideas are always bad ideas.
Please give us your opinion on that question.
Religion, like fairy tales are human creations...your beliefs and your gods are fallible.