So you do not think Relationship is more superior than debating? And creating one between me and you will not have a more fulfilling and more happy result then just debating?
Now Ssshhh.. we can?t be leaving proof all over the place now. ;P
I?m certainly frustrated by the wilfull ignorance of his followers, you?ve got that right.
It does if you include Paul Martin, who balanced 10 Federal budgets in a row and paid down debt.
Of what exactly?
What makes marriage the "best" way to express love between two people of the same sex?
Nothing like what the Byzantines were able to get the Latins to assemble. When else in history did Greek, German, Italian, French, and English armies and aristocrats all fight a common enemy and establish mutual vassal states... instead of each other?
I will sacrifice pain for shoes. Though my feet are huge!
Everything I've posted is a FACT.
Why did you vote for one that could?
BOTH you described is a felony
As colonials - you are not paying for it.
The price of gold is not reliant on the price of milk.
Yes, clearly the modern species delineated came from a relatively narrow gene pool. And your point is. . . . .?
Why do you insist on participating in a conversation where you don't understand the basic facts? Does this behaviour not annoy you when creationists do it?
Well, that didn?t take long....
A lot of couples offload confrontation to whichever of the pair who has more appetite for it. I wouldn't read too much into it.
It's possible that I've listened to more lectures by Richard Dawkins and you have, I don't know. But I can say out of his own mouth along with other top-tier atheistic lecturers they all agree there is no good or evil. Maybe you should get out more.
Is it gluten free and humanely resourced too?
@ her collegue??????????
Where do you get your info?
Cells that have never lived outside the body are not the same as a living breathing person that has.
It's all so clear now.
rather the opposite they have too much, and an inability to express it in a socially acceptable manner.
I guess we're all ignorant since there is no evidence. I believe when there is no evidence of something, that something doesn't exist. If evidence shows up, then that's a different matter. However, logically, I don't see why there is a need for a Creator. The universe seems to exist without one.
I'm not the one opining, you two-bit fraud. .
Some gods are proven impossible by science, yeah. Others are harder to pin down.
No they are all perfect analogies. But most people who find they can not address the analogies because it implicates their position usually say that.
Yes, the right to have a cake baked for you. That's definitely one of the most important rights we have here in America.