I did, what part of "many on the right" is exclusive
Because chance is irrelevant to past events. If you roll a single die and all land on six six times in a row... that doesn't mean the chances are now that you'll roll another six. Its the same odds as before. The difference is now the chance that you landed six sixes in a row was one of one. It has NO baring on future rolls. The odds of the next roll is still one in six that you'll hit six again. There is no chance that your past roll will not have been six sixes in a row. That already occurred. Chances are irrelevant for past events. They occurred. You are, as I pointed out confusing past and present tense and attempting to use it incorrectly. They are not interchangeable in this context but instead are irrelevant to what had occurred.
Maybe that is the smart thing...but I don't think that it's the best thing. It seems backwards to me.
No - it says that history, by its nature, cannot be concerned with the supernatural. In the case of history, we must assume a natural cause for everything - otherwise it is useless. Would you accept any history which contained non-Christian (or Jewish) miracles? Do you think that the parts of the Iliad where the gods directly intervene are historical?
I've discussed what I believe with H0mo Sapien in the last thread I made. You can do the dirty work and read it if you are that interested. As for the other.use the search function inside the channel or ask any of the self-proclaimed Christians to give you various examples.
modern day whitened sepulcures
We will disagree, as that story is not about justice, its about killing innocents as an act of terror.
This loss by the Ontario Liberals all but ensures a federal Liberal win in 2019. It's a votimg trend of provincial politics in Ontario almost as consistent as the laws of thermodynamics.
I've always wondered that too. It kind of makes me go eek inside, and my hands and arms feel funny.
Free doesn't mean benefit the 1% and not society as a whole. Republicans version of free economy is not giving people what they want.
Yeah - they discriminated against people who speak Latin.
lol you literally just argued that they couldn't have used a gun to defend themselves.
Let me put on my arch-conservative hat
If you read my post as carefully as you think you did, you'll see that I wrote that Jesus was predicting that the end of the world would come within his own lifetime. Just because he promoted himself as a prophet of the end times doesn't mean what he was predicting came true.
Wow, did you come up with that all by yourself? LOL
Why are you clinging to this something from nothing claim. It took almost 2000 years of efforts by real people each contributing their small part to make an Altneuland (Old New Land ) what do you have against Zionism?
You think Dennis Rodman would be a great Secretary of State.
Hopefully you will be joining me for the live coverage tomorrow evening. I'm sure a page will be set up and I'm gonna push our fine mods right to the limit.
To think if only they didn't get their tax break, The Church of Scientology would be demolished.
The White House wouldn't want them, either. So, I guess we're even.
I don't know, do you ? Can you also attest that every time it is sung, the rendition is flawless ? Of course not, and it would be unreasonable of me to challenge you on that basis. However, there is adequate evidence (nearly 6million instances in one repository alone) that supports my view.