You're absolutely right there my friend.
if only it would compile and run on first try!
you point #2 is false. there is always an edge to the scientific understanding, and currently, we cannot guess at what came before the big bang. but that does not mean there was nothing before that, or that scientists claim there was nothing
I think Mohammed's more influential than Jesus on history.
It is their God?s (let?s call it) inconsistency (or I?d call it bipolarity) that helps ruin their argument. IMO.
If you love such restrictions then move there. I oppose telling people what to wear.
That you know of.
Are 'A' and 'B' exclusive of each other?
Science uses metaphors to describe and explain things that are tested and verified.
Oxycontin made me fly (in my mind at least).
It's irrelevant either way. Einstein's faith or lack thereof means nothing.
There was also issues at Chalcedon on exactly what was The relationship of Jesus to Christ. (Jesus is Greek for Joshua which means savior, while Christ is Greek for Missiah or Meshiah which means the anointed one or the selected one.
Aye don't have to fear him anymore...he is my friend!!!!
I never said she was a creationist. I never said natural selection was anything more than it is, mech for small short term change. I never said she thought it was anything more or less either..than mechanism for small short term change.
My first PC was as I remember IBM with "enormous" :-) 10 MB HD and 2 floppies, I think it had 64 KB of memory. :-) I have good memories on that times.
But Catholics here are arguing that God and the Son are the same. Either way the story makes no sense. If Jesus is God's son, he is not given. The line should say, For God so loved His son that He took him away for 2000 years and asked people to believe that He really did that for no reason so that He could.... I can't even finish that sentence. That is how much I have no idea why anyone thinks this story is even the slightest bit sensical.
I would land somewhere >51. Since we all know there is no definitive proof of God, I would have to say that the preponderance of evidence and the coherence of the evidence is what prove it to me. Yes, I suppose it
Because that is living a life that pleasures the here and now?
Your reasoning doesn't add up.
Another example of your dishonesty.
I think he's pandering for the black vote....
Then you continue to show an utter lack of knowledge about education. As I already said, you can't imagine that people are able to leave their own biases on the doorstep, but they can. I have done so, when providing training to large groups and to individuals. It is part of the duties of an educator to teach to the curriculum, and to be impartial where appropriate.
We have a non-denomination mega church in our area that was getting their members a few years back to get sub-prime mortgages on homes they could not afford. Come to find out the pastor was part owner of the mortgage company and while these folks were losing homes they could not afford, that rascal was spending $150,000 on new cars at the Chevrolet dealership
Explain love "scientifically" please.
Trump is a sleaseball. No one can say otherwise. It is true.
Gnomes are a cousin to the leprechaun. Leprechauns DO get to go to heaven, btw.
Laws on slavery, orders to commit genocide.
Barring cleanliness and safety issues, why the f/// should anyone get to decide what someone else's hair gets to be like?
I wasn't even familiar with the term. I googled it and if what I'm reading is accurate, I would totally agree with you.
The Children of the Kingdom is the Children of God. The Name of the Child of God is Jesus. That makes them Jesus too.
"What could constitute substantial support from intuition or intellect more than a god sending himself to sacrifice himself to himself to save us from himself?"