Ok, I think it is good that you see nothing wrong with it in a way, however in terms of procedures and consent there is no difference between the topics in regards to results, there will be benefits.
Hmmm. Please, count all the people killed in the ?name? of atheism, then count all the people killed in the name of one of the multitudes of gods.
I love most shellfish.
I guess one can be a faithful Christian and be against gun ownership although I think from a freedom standpoint it's foolish and in my opinion Christians should be pro-freedom. But violence against innocent people, whether by guns or any other means, should be condemned by all Christians.
Can you give an example? Do you mean, eg, that if I could transport back to the 1st c CE, I could "know" whether Jesus of Nazareth actually existed as a historical person? But since I can't teleport, to some extent I have to take it on faith? If that's what you mean to say, then true, but true for every piece of history & info we inherit.
That part is sad, I agree.
True. They were not merely atheists, they were anti-theists, as guided by their hero, Karl Marx.
I don't even know that much about science but I do know what it can't do.
Forgive me. I assumed you understood English and the idiomatic use of pronouns by English speakers.
Only young earthers believe 6000 years.
"That little tantrum seems to demonstrate some underlying insecurities."
What denomination are you talking about? West hillsboro baptist church? Because they are disliked by a larger group of christians not just liberals, atheists others...
Ontario is dumb enough to vote Cut Cut Cut Ford?
Sorry but it's entirely correct.unless it was a lie like the rest of your fairy tale