Wrong. You must have a license to open a public business and are excepting a promise that you will follow all local, state, and federal regulations, including serving the public in a fair and nondiscriminatory fashion. If you don't want to serve all the public then find a non-compromising business or find a better religion (one that does not require discrimination).
years of travel - study - prayer and proof Ma'am =D
Cute belief. Odd that your most coherent moment is when you copy past something.
Cite the law.
Why not? If it's not a human life, it's no different than removing a tumor or cyst. I'm pro tumor removal. Why aren't you pro abortion, especially if it isn't really a baby?
Keep it civil please, Peter.
Well, what im saying is, I have that option available to me rather than no option at all.
But but but fake or real... Decisions decisions I can not stand it!!! Where is my AR-15?
Vikings sound better than these guys...
Thank you for your counsel. I have never said the things you accuse me of, that we will become little gods. I merely have supplied the scriptures where my conclusions have been drawn from, and you have decided that I have crossed the line. If what I have posted finds no place in your comprehension that does not make me a cultist. It is an indication of something else altogether.
Which makes your appeal to the fact that air is mostly transparent reasonable how?
You're talking out your butthole. The majority of police and military would nail your ass to a cross if ordered to. A steady paycheck, secure employment, healthcare, education, etc guarantees obedience. Th at and there's always a fresh new batch of recruits desperate for a job who will do what is necessary. I have known many Military and Police, ALL of them wouldn't hesitate to drag you out of your home pissing all over yourself.
You are obviously missing the point of my comments.
Care to point out any falsehoods, illogic and irrationality in Epicurean pariah's post?
Well, since James replied too, I guess I'll say stuff..
Irrelevant to discussion.
Maybe he identifies as something else.
So you?d give a 5 year old a gun?
Nah, I'll pass.
President trump channel doesn't pretend its unbiased though
It was a very narrow holding, so I don't think we can go that far. The case was really about whether the baker got a fair hearing to begin with.
are they members of the Melchizadek Priesthood?
So, presuming that your OK with Catholic baptism and daily doctrine class for your children, then?
First of all, what did the indictment of 13 Russians, on charges of interfering in our election, have to do with "finding a crime" to remove a president? Is Mueller seriously expecting them to come to the US, plead guilty to having colluded with the Trump campaign, and giving testimony in return for a reduced sentence? No, of course he isn't. Secondly, there was already evidence of a crime, which prompted the original investigation to begin in July of 2016, almost a year before the investigation by Mueller began. Thirdly, Manafort faces charges for crimes, not crime, and many of them were not investigated years before and dropped. BTW, there are times when investigations are dropped and then, years later, they're reopened when new evidence comes to light or new investigative techniques come into use. That's not some sort of harassment or meanness. It's called justice. BTW, I don't buy your story, in your last paragraph, and we'll see how "unproven" it is when it, along with other charges, goes to trial. If Manafort has managed to get better lawyers than Trump can get and, unlike Trump, he actually listens to them, maybe he'll get off. Everybody knows that good lawyers can create enough reasonable doubt to allow guilty people to walk the streets unpunished. BTW, I'm surprised that Manafort hasn't caved because there are enough charges to put him away for life. Mueller, a Republican, doesn't like Trump? Was that revealed in your lengthy interview with him?
My null hypothesis is the standard model and the four fundamental forces of nature... That gives us the universe you and I see... What is your replacement that invalidates my null hypothesis? And how?
The Aneristic Principle is that of APPARENT ORDER; the Eristic Principle is that of APPARENT DISORDER. Both order and disorder are man made concepts and are artificial divisions of PURE CHAOS, which is a level deeper that is the level of distinction making. With our concept making apparatus called "mind" we look at reality through the ideas-about-reality which our cultures give us. The ideas-about-reality are mistakenly labeled "reality" and unenlightened people are forever perplexed by the fact that other people, especially other cultures, see "reality" differently. It is only the ideas-about-reality which differ. Real (capital-T True) reality is a level deeper that is the level of concept. We look at the world through windows on which have been drawn grids (concepts). Different philosophies use different grids. A culture is a group of people with rather similar grids. Through a window we view chaos, and relate it to the points on our grid, and thereby understand it. The ORDER is in the GRID. That is the Aneristic Principle. Western philosophy is traditionally concerned with contrasting one grid with another grid, and amending grids in hopes of finding a perfect one that will account for all reality and will, hence, (say unenlightened westerners) be True. This is illusory; it is what we Erisians call the ANERISTIC ILLUSION. Some grids can be more useful than others, some more beautiful than others, some more pleasant than others, etc., but none can be more True than any other. DISORDER is simply unrelated information viewed through some particular grid. But, like "relation", no-relation is a concept. Male, like female, is an idea about sex. To say that male-ness is "absence of female-ness", or vice versa, is a matter of definition and metaphysically arbitrary. The artificial concept of no-relation is the ERISTIC PRINCIPLE. The belief that "order is true" and disorder is false or somehow wrong, is the Aneristic Illusion. To say the same of disorder, is the ERISTIC ILLUSION. The point is that (little-t) truth is a matter of definition relative to the grid one is using at the moment, and that (capital-T) Truth, metaphysical reality, is irrelevant to grids entirely. Pick a grid, and through it some chaos appears ordered and some appears disordered. Pick another grid, and the same chaos will appear differently ordered and disordered. Reality is the original Rorschach. Verily! So much for all that.
What part of the world?
Everyone does. I got them online, but you may find them locally somewhere. And they"re not expensive, really, if you don't put them on everything.
Sperm and Eggs are not a "stage" of "growth". They are a stage of species propagation. Unless they form a viable fetus. At that point all of the required DNA and chemicals are present to grow a human. UP to that point all you have are catalysts which individually can't make a human.
Apologies, after rereading your comment I completely misinterpreted you. I try to avoid rigid idealogues that populate here.
The time is now.
What is right of the course against freedom or marriage?
So many spamming invites and typos!!