and this woman may be the same
Why would I want him?
Ooh question game! Classy!
Enacting unconstitutional laws is the hallmark of homophobic bigots.
I just showed you a detailed example of gradualism. Are you going to keep ignoring it so you can continue to repeat yourself over and over?
A repetitive redundancy.
It's only a drop in the bucket, but it sends a much needed message to the scumbag employers who hire these illegals that they are putting their businesses and income at risk when they hire illegals.
*not an archaeologist* is the key. He's never done any actual field work at the site. Do you know of any real archaeologists who think anything Salm has to say is even remotely worth considering?
I have my doubts too
The elephant in the room
This stuff should have been posted on a Friday instead so I could just go kill the affected brain cells at the bar... now I gotta wait lol.
You just came into possession of great method of revenge. Be it an ex, someone who has done you wrong, a terrible boss. Its someone you loathe..and isn't permanent and doesn't cause an injury,
"The assumption that because I'm a Christian I therefore hate gays and
let's not do this here,pleeeease. Yvonne made it clear she doesn't want this thread to be about abortion debates. We hate modding abortion topics here bc it gets so toxic and nasty really fast. As a compromise, if you want to start your own thread about it, I will agree to mod it until it turns ugly then I'll close.
Here is Alan Guth explaining that everything comes from nothing during the inflation process:
Bloomberg: US Second -Quarter Growth Forecasts Surge on Trade, Inventories. Morgan Stanley projects 2nd quarter GDP at 3.3% IHS Markit projects 3.6%, Goldman Sachs projects 3.4% Steven Stanley boosted his projection to 4.2%. Tax cuts STIMULATE the economy!
Just lock that conniving corrupt rat up, for real, Manafort's bad news is all my good thoughts flowing plenteously, it keeps getting worse for him, to my delight, any ounce of mercy or stroke of serendipity is too much mercy for that guy, I already said, any deal that could possibly alleviate his troubles would be an injustice, call that too late, throw away key.
What an interesting topic. I'd first have to say, No, I don't believe the bible to be the infallible word of God, but I do have a reason.
"now you're just talking dirty to me..."....
'Appeal to experience' is not a single unitary concept but a complex one which could include everything from standard experimental empiricism (which is by definition based on empirical experience/observation) to drug-induced hallucinations and much in between. Most knowledge claims are grounded in testimony or appeal to authority in any case (both in religion and other spheres such as current events, history and many others where we cannot directly experience the objects of cognition (e.g. the past or an event we cannot observe). The problem is not one of trusting experience or trusting alleged authorities, but rather determining *which* experiences and which alleged experts should be treated as reliable sources. Empiricism,among other things, tries to render observational experience a) systematic b) predictable and c) capable of being replicated by others. If we treat knowledge as hypotheses about what events will be observed/experienced under specified conditions (e.g. in a laboratory experiment) and our predictions pan out across multiple trials (i.e. we experience/observe the same results) than we have shown those experiences/observations to be capable of confirmation in public. They are still experiences, but they are not unique to individual subjects since they can be repeated (e.g. I experience burning when putting my hand into a flame, but so do others-- and in a way that can be easily demonstrated in public). So we *want* knowledge to be based on experience, but experience that has observable and predictable consequences which can be evaluated by multiple experiencers or observers.
Then your standards are awfully low and speaking of low standards, care to describe my beliefs. The only sounding like an idiot--and a dishonest idiot at that--is you.