The Eastern Christians have been reading the Bible 1000 years before the printing press appeared.
Whatever it is, I admit, because of Catholic education institutions many poor children got educated in developing countries. American care provided broken wheat with Soy oil gave nutrients to many poor in poor countries.
I would assume if a researcher had found evidence of the historical truth of the Bible myths, it would be mentioned in the reviews. After all, these are the works you pointed to to prove there was historical proof of the myths.
Reporting a story is not "an opinion"
All that to say, in Rudiger language, that it's a religious level, faith-based belief.
(Kenny isn't a "basher", actually. He has some pretty insightful comments.)
He feels I should wear shorts under my dress. I told him he will lose this debate. As long as my dress covers my bottom, I'm wearing panties. He should be grateful I'm wearing anything at all when I go out in public.
But sharts are even funnier. Unless it happens to you. Then it blows.
Here's a thought, Gillette -- you keep insisting that one's orientation is a "choice"... the burden of proof is on you to back up that claim.
False again. I do NOT care what google says about "consummate" as it is not relevant to what was considered consummation in the first century. The Bible itself refutes you.
Your argument therefore is that, despite the fact that he regularly sells wedding cakes, he doesn't regularly sell wedding cakes that signify vaginas or swastikas, therefore he is not obligated to start doing so. If we apply that same argument to Jack Philips it would go like this; despite the fact that he regularly sells wedding cakes, he doesn't regularly sell wedding cakes that signify a same sex wedding, therefore he is not obligated to start selling such cakes.
Depends on the race.
Well, at least you are keeping your debate skills sharp!