I guess once again I am wrong? I was thinking we were just stating our case
The Christian attitude on homosexuality is taught to children at a very young age. They are taught that they can be intolerant of such activity and it is sanctioned by the church. This sometimes manifests itself in homophobic bullying whether or not the other child is gay or not. This bullying sometimes ends up to be severe for children that are not self confident. That creates even more of a lack of self confidence until something breaks. What happens after that can be seen in suicide rates among school children and other nefarious activities. Even after a child turns of 18 and are out of school they are not fully mature and this bullying can continue and it continues through their entire life for some. Some grow up and try to pass laws that are discriminatory towards gays.
I know some women who like dipping their french fries or nuggets inside their vanilla ice cream.
God has proven it. If God doesn't prove the same to you, there really is nothing I can do about it. Metaphysical understanding comes through contemplation of absolute, ultimate categories. Aristotle outlines the process and progression very well.
Perhaps you can?t detect because you are blind?
The attempt to reduce the conflict of civilisations which is many centuries old to the trivial "jealousy" is ridiculous. Try to learn the ME history.
A star wars holiday show LOLOLOLOLOLOL inhale LOLOLOLOLOL
I want my Globe(s) warmed... hhehehe
I see you have not adapted to Earth forms of communication, keep trying.
It's a small scar. Hardly noticable
I gave you an extensive historical and sociological treatment in another response. Here, your statement about "during that time" is poorly phrased. Whatever your meaning, however, you clearly don?t understand the crucial development in Christian society of the monks in monasteries pursuing spiritual growth training and doing it in the context of the Church?s historically and culturally unique position that established networks of cultural coherency in support of Jesus in the Bible, no matter how high their gradients of integrity and hypocrisy. No one else had that basis.
Nothing but long term right wing attachment to a silly lie has anything to do with
Except that word was NOT in the original scripture because it did not exist. It was falsely interpreted much later.
we work with them so they know what they look like by now
... Which no baby has any control over. Therefore, we're back to guilty by the virtue of being born.
even that idiot has more sense than you.
There is a reason nature resulted in uncircumcised penis. It makes sex more pleasurable for both people involved by reducing friction. Circumcision, like the injunction against pork and shell fish, had a medical basis, albeit one that is easily remedied with a bit of logic and understanding of science. In other words wash your genitalia thoroughly and cook your pork and fish more completely and you won't have issues with urinary tract infections and getting sick from parasites sometimes prevalent in pork and fish, etc...