Why would women do that?
Is that a good thing or a bad thing?
Again, Exodus International did reparative therapy. Tell us what they are up to now. Is there a reason you won't do this?
Well, that just goes to show the hazards of taking doctrine too seriously and literally.
And still... you've got nothing to contribute?
Rejected letter for a bad advice thread, but an interesting..if scary read. Way too worrying and real world for use in a bad advice thread.
50,000 now??? It was just 40,000 yesterday. 30,000 last week. Lol. Like the fish getting bigger.
If you take a position of responsibility, people with give you authority. Part of the job is setting boundaries, volunteer or not.
Only if you allow me to accept...
Point out the many reasons white supremacy is stupid when seen.
Well, that makes it easy, doesn't it?
I don't think he was referring to you, but those you mentioned...
Also, ICYMI -
Depends, doesn't it? People rob banks with armed guards.
Girl let me take you out to chillis then
We're only storytellers....
Paul didn't always dictate to scribes. He actually sometimes would point out if he was the one personally writing (Galatians 6:11: "See what large letters I make when I am writing in my own hand!")
However, there wasn't official war, whatever that would mean, at the time of assassination of Kaab. Unless we assume that Islam is at war with Kafirs nonstop, which is actually true. Under Sharia, unless Kafirs submitted to dhimmi status or there is a peace treaty which cannot exceed 10 years, war with non-Muslim world is the default state.
You've yet to use any.
You believe a particular religion is true based on faith. A person of a completely different religion can believe their's is true based on faith. If you both use the same method to come to completely different conclusions then there is a problem with the method.
Too many polysyllabic words. Try a meme to get a septic to pay attention.
What, conspiracies don't exist?
Kind of makes you wonder about the King James Onlyists that their translation is not only misleading, but it had to be "updated" by the New King James Version, the New International Version, etc. I'm not quibbling with your reading of it, just pointing out that no one realized "they" was better than "he" until atheists and critics started pointing out the anomaly.